uconn

Safety in Research

“The way we conduct research, engage our students, and prepare the next generation of scholars requires that we ensure the health and well-being of all involved. Strengthening and supporting a culture of safety is as important to our discovery enterprise as is peer review, publication, grant writing, mentoring, and educating; it is integral to the responsible conduct of research…Safety is a critical component of scholarly excellence…Good science is safe science.” APLU Council on Research (2016).

UConn is dedicated to promoting a culture of safety and provides resources and mechanisms to support researchers in conducting safe, responsible, and successful research activities:

The Department of Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) provides comprehensive services in the fields of biological safety, chemical safety, occupational safety, radiation safety, and environmental health. EHS maintains and administers programs that combine training, consultation, control, and inspection to protect the health and safety of the University community and to ensure regulatory compliance and adherence to University policies and recognized standards.

Research Integrity & Compliance works to promote safety and regulatory compliance in research by maintaining faculty lead oversight committees.  The safety committees supported by this office include:

Research Misconduct

The University of Connecticut is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in the performance, reporting, reviewing and proposing of research and scholarly activity.  To this end, it is the responsibility of all faculty, staff, students, trainees and visiting scientists to refrain from and prevent research misconduct.

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.

  • Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
  • Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
  • Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results or words without giving appropriate credit. Authorship disputes are not defined as plagiarism in this policy.

Research misconduct does not include honest errors or differences of opinion.

It is also the responsibility of the research community to report suspected incidents of research misconduct.

Policies

Policy on Alleged Misconduct in Research

Non-Retaliation Policy

Reporting Research Concerns

All concerns related to human research, animal research, conflict of interest, research misconduct, research financial accounting, research safety or other research compliance matters should be reported by calling Research Integrity & Compliance at 860-679-2230, Office of University Compliance at 860-486-2530, or the specific area.

Concerns can also be reported anonymously through the REPORTLINE by calling a toll-free number at (888) 685-2637 or via the REPORTLINE website. The REPORTLINE is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year operated by a private (non-UConn) company. You may contact the hotline to report a concern without giving your name. You will be able to re-contact the REPORTLINE to track your report to provide further information at a later date or to obtain general updates about the status of your concern.

The University welcomes and encourages good-faith reporting. As such, individuals who submit a report or participate in a compliance investigation in good faith are provided protection from retaliation per the University’s Non-Retaliation Policy.

Additional information on reporting concerns can be found at the Office of University Compliance website..pdf

Resources

The following is a list of videos on research misconduct and integrity from the US Office of Research Integrity.

The Lab, Avoiding Research Misconduct – In this interactive movie, you can choose an alter-ego and become a graduate student, post doc, PI or RIO, and make decisions facing you in a case of data falsification. Decisions that can have long-term consequences on your career. The movie addresses topics such as avoiding research misconduct, mentorship, data stewardship, authorship, and more. The movie has versions in English, Spanish and Chinese.

The Research Clinic – In this movie, you can become a PI, a clinical research coordinator, a research assistant, or an institutional review board (IRB) chair, and make decisions that protect research subjects and avoid research misconduct.

Internal Funding Opportunities – Overview

The Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) supports faculty research, scholarship, and creative endeavors through a wide range of internal funding programs.  OVPR internal grants serve as high-leverage, strategic investments in outstanding faculty research projects that are at critical stages of development.  Our internal funding mechanisms are designed to competitively identify projects that fit our key funding criteria–projects that meet the highest disciplinary standards for excellence and are at a “tipping point” where specific work can lead to breakthroughs, external funding, and/or significant recognition. Recognizing that those crucial moments occur at various stages of the research process (and require different levels of funding to address, depending on your discipline), OVPR internal funding programs include large and small dollar mechanisms that focus on seed funding, completion/publication funding, and commercialization funding.

If you are a UConn/UConn Health faculty member who has a project that is ready to move to the next level, we invite you to browse our program guidelines to learn more.  You are also welcome to contact us (research@uconn.edu) to ask questions and to discuss which mechanisms are best suited to meet your needs.

The OVPR-Research Development Services (OVPR-RDS) team is excited to host (virtual) Teams Internal Funding Office Hours where faculty can share their novel seed grant project ideas and ask questions about the internal funding competitions.

Click to sign up for a time slot

Office hours for all awards are:

  • Tuesdays, 10 a.m. to noon
  • Wednesdays, 2 to 4 p.m.

 

Overview of FY 25 – FY 26 Internal Funding Opportunity Timelines (Last updated 4/07/25)

Program

Applications open

Applications due (12 noon)

Target for Notifications

Scholarship Facilitation Fund – SFF Fall (Storrs/Regional Campuses only) FY26 1/6/2025 6/1/2025 6/30/2025
UConn Quantum Technologies Translation Award (QuTech) Program 2/24/2025 3/31/2025 5/2025
UConn Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI FY25) Research Initiative 1/6/2025 3/3/2025 6/2025
SPARK Commercialization Technology fund – SPARK FY25 9/16/2024 10/28/2024 (LOI) – 2/24/2025 (Full proposal due by invitation only) 5/2025
Research Excellence Program –REP FY25 9/16/2024 12/16/2024 5/2025
Scholarship and Collaboration in Humanities and Arts Research – SCHARP FY25 9/16/2024 12/16/2024 5/2025
Convergence Awards for Research in Interdisciplinary Centers – CARIC FY26 TBD TBD TBD
Clinical Research and Innovation Seed Program – CRISP FY26 TBD TBD TBD

 

Table Key:

Complete / not yet open
Open for Applications In Review

Useful Links

 

Open Source – External Resources & Tools

General Information

What is Open Source?

Open Source Licenses

Overview of Standard/Popular Licenses

Generally Accepted Licenses

Open Source License Selection

Choosing an Appropriate License

License Differentiator – Interactive License Selection Tool

Tabular Comparison of License Terms

Software Licenses in Plain English

 

License Compatibility

 

Example Page

This is a <h1> tag

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras tincidunt imperdiet interdum. Nullam vitae pulvinar dui. Aliquam eget scelerisque massa, et eleifend odio. Phasellus at pretium dolor. Donec eget mauris eu massa aliquet tristique ut ultricies felis. Maecenas interdum, diam ut tempor suscipit, felis mdssdsdfauris iaculis orci, ac consectetur sem tortor non nunc. Aliquam vitae rutrum neque, id vestibulum erat. Donec placerat volutpat leo quis posuere. Aliquam sit amet metus dui.

This is a <h2> tag

Aenean eleifend lorem id ipsum auctor eleifend. Nulla id dolor dui. Aenean accumsan dolor ut lacus pretium, ac faucibus felis sagittis. Donec faucibus sed est a facilisis. Curabitur in est dignissim, egestas ligula et, fringilla arcu. Morbi ut dictum felis. Ut nec dolor tellus. Nullam sagittis odio urna. Nunc rhoncus neque non magna placerat tincidunt. Donec quis tristique sem, sit amet dapibus urna. Nulla viverra nec nisl a egestas. Nullam sed placerat tellus. Proin dui massa, venenatis et ipsum in, pretium luctus elit.

This is a <h3> tag

Phasellus viverra vulputate facilisis. Quisque volutpat, dolor sed facilisis dignissim, turpis ante consequat quam, non tempus libero nunc euismod leo. Aenean lorem justo, interdum in diam congue, pretium vestibulum neque. Integer pharetra turpis a ante posuere cursus. Donec sit amet aliquam lacus, vel blandit massa. Phasellus lectus erat, porta nec sem et, venenatis efficitur ex. Cras sem risus, tincidunt sit amet nibh sed, pharetra molestie urna. Sed sollicitudin justo ligula, ac mollis ligula euismod vitae.

This is a <h4> tag

Cras a aliquet enim. Curabitur non purus turpis. Nunc facilisis, tortor vitae ultrices sollicitudin, ipsum lacus auctor risus, sit amet mattis nunc nisi eu augue. Vestibulum vel sem eu erat posuere mollis. Donec pellentesque lacinia mi, vitae blandit ex venenatis quis. Curabitur dignissim neque vitae sapien pellentesque consectetur. Aenean in eros nibh. Duis pellentesque libero sapien, eu porttitor arcu suscipit id. Mauris pretium facilisis accumsan. Pellentesque vehicula metus ipsum, sit amet volutpat metus faucibus et. Fusce hendrerit erat eget ante posuere faucibus. Ut porttitor, nisl id dignissim ultrices, nibh libero gravida ipsum, et feugiat dolor arcu at lorem. Maecenas vel convallis sapien.

This is a <h5> tag

Fusce id vehicula tortor. Sed sed diam tincidunt magna convallis ullamcorper id a lectus. Aenean faucibus vulputate tincidunt. Ut maximus magna non dui consequat ultrices. Mauris vitae tellus ac purus condimentum sollicitudin. Nulla volutpat enim quis metus tincidunt cursus. Curabitur id turpis in arcu placerat convallis.

This is a <h6> tag

Aenean eleifend lorem id ipsum auctor eleifend. Nulla id dolor dui. Aenean accumsan dolor ut lacus pretium, ac faucibus felis sagittis. Donec faucibus sed est a facilisis. Curabitur in est dignissim, egestas ligula et, fringilla arcu. Morbi u

This is preformatted text right here

Aenean eleifend lorem id ipsum auctor eleifend. Nulla id dolor dui. Aenean accumsan dolor ut lacus pretium, ac faucibus felis sagittis. Donec faucibus sed est a facilisis. Curabitur in est dignissim, egestas ligula et, fringilla arcu. Morbi u

dog tester
Dog running and doing its dog-things

IPB at UConn Tech Park

The Innovation Partnership Building (IPB), an 113,700 square foot research building, officially opened its doors in 2018. The unique facility boasts state-of-the-art specialized equipment and instrumentation for nanofabrication, precision manufacturing, biomedical devices/sensor development, advanced modeling/simulation and material characterization.  The IPB serves a nexus of intellectual, physical and cyber assets intended to foster industry-academic partnerships for research, innovation technology commercialization and job growth for the State of Connecticut.

For more information visit techpark.uconn.edu

Innovation Partnership Building
Innovation Partnership Building

Submission

Once the proposal is reviewed by the Pre-Award Specialist and all required documents are in place, the proposal is forwarded to the University’s authorized representative for review, approval and signature.  The signed proposal is then forwarded back to the Pre-Award Specialist. Submission to the sponsor is handled as follows:

Hardcopy (paper) submissions

  • Pre-Award Services returns all signed documents to the principal investigator and/or department administrator.
  • The principal investigator or department administrator submits the final approved proposal to the sponsor.
  • The principal investigator or departmental administrator forwards a full copy of the submitted proposal to Pre-Award Services at preaward@uconn.edu.
  • A full copy of the proposal is filed and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.

Electronic submissions NOT required by the University’s institutional representative

  • Pre-Award Services returns all signed documents to the principal investigator and/or department administrator.
  • The principal investigator or department administrator submits the final approved electronic proposal to the sponsor.
  • The principal investigator and/or department administrator monitors the proposal submission through sponsor acceptance of the proposal for review. If there are errors requiring correction to the proposal or application, the principal investigator and/or department administrator makes the necessary corrections and contacts Pre-Award Services to review and approve.
  • The principal investigator or departmental administrator forwards a full copy of the submitted proposal to PreAward Services at preaward@uconn.edu.
  • A full copy of the proposal is filed and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.

Electronic submissions required by the University’s institutional representative:

  • Pre-Award Services submits the final approved electronic proposal to the sponsor.
  • Pre-Award Services forwards all submission notifications and confirmations to the principal investigator and/or department administrator.
  • Pre-Award Services, the principal investigator and/or department administrator monitors the proposal submission through sponsor acceptance of the proposal for review. If there are errors requiring correction, the principal investigator and/or department administrator makes the necessary corrections and contacts Pre-Award Services to resubmit.
  • A full copy of the proposal is filed and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.

Budget Justification

The proposal budget is the financial plan of action that reflects the costs required to perform the proposed work statement. It is important to demonstrate that the budget proposed is reasonable.  A budget justification should be submitted in order to allow each budget item to be explained relative to the proposed research.  The specifics of the sponsoring agency’s budgetary guidelines should be followed carefully.  Budgets should be prepared for the entire proposed project. Both direct and F & A costs should be identified in the budget.

Budgeting

The proposal budget is the financial plan of action that reflects the costs required to perform the proposed work statement.  The following information has been prepared to help you develop your budget plan.  See our Budgeting and Costing Guide for current information on fringe benefits, graduate stipends, Facilities and Administration (F&A) rates (Indirect Costs) and other budgetary matters.

It is important to demonstrate that the budget proposed is reasonable.  A budget justification should be submitted in order to allow each budget item to be explained relative to the proposed research.  The specifics of the sponsoring agency’s budgetary guidelines should be followed carefully.  Budgets should be prepared for the entire proposed project. Both direct and F & A costs should be identified in the budget.

Research Compliance

Research Integrity & Compliance Services (RICS)

Research Integrity & Compliance Services (RICS) oversees compliance requirements at the university related to research. Policies, procedures and guidelines are designed to support the responsible and ethical conduct of university research and to ensure adherence to all laws and regulations guiding research.  Major areas of compliance include:

  • Animal Subjects/IACUC
  • Human Subjects/IRB
  • Institutional Biosafety (biohazards, DNA, Select Agents, Dual Use research)
  • Research Ethics (COI, RCR, misconduct)
  • Research Safety and Security (biosafety Data use
  • Export Controls

For more information, please contact Research Integrity & Compliance Services

 

Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI)

The University requires, at a minimum, an annual disclosure from all faculty members regarding outside activities and financial interests.  At the time of proposal submission, investigators must completed their online FCOI disclosures in the InfoEd External Interests Module. Some sponsors require FCOI disclosures at the proposal stage and the University will not submit proposals until such disclosures have been completed.

All subrecipients must certify, at the proposal stage, that its institution has implemented and enforced an FCOI policy compliant with the respective regulations or that they lack a compliant FCOI policy and will implement a policy prior to subaward issuance.  Additionally, the responsible personnel at the subrecipient must complete and submit the External Investigator Disclosure Form.

For more information, please contact Financial Conflict of Interest

Proposal Contents

Most sponsors publish guidelines on how to prepare a proposal and the requirements.  The application package may also include forms that require a signature from an authorized official. Sponsor instructions should be followed carefully for format, content, and budget and submission requirements.

The following is a list of common proposal elements. If there are no sponsor guidelines these documents represent the minimum required by Pre-Award Services. For most sponsor agencies, proposals contain most or all of these elements.  (Specific agency guidelines, if available, should always be followed.)

  • Proposal guidelines from sponsoring agency or website link: assists with reviewing proposal and ensuring all sponsor requirements are met prior to submission.
  • Internal Proposal Review Form: complete for all proposals and secure signatures of the Principal Investigator, Co-Principal Investigator(s), Department Chair, Unit Head, and in some cases Dean as appropriate.
  • SPS Proposal Cover Page: complete if the sponsor does not provide a cover page for approval signature. Please refer to the Frequently Requested Information for assistance with completing the sponsor cover page. The University’s Authorized Representative signs all proposals on behalf of the University.
  • Proposal Narrative: describe the objectives, methodology and significance of the proposed project.
  • Budget Spreadsheet: provide a reasonable estimate of expenses for each budget category. Include cost sharing/matching only if specifically required by the funding agency. Please refer to the Budgeting and Costing Guide for assistance.
  • Budget Justification: provide a detailed explanation of all items listed in the budget. Please refer to the budget justification guide for assistance.
  • Electronic application (if applicable): provide a completed application or access to the completed application.
  • Subcontracts (if applicable): provide a statement of work, budget, budget justification, F&A Rate Agreement and Information and Compliance Form for Subrecipients, signed by an authorized official of that organization.  Please refer to the  Subaward Determination Guidance for assistance with determining the subrecipient versus contractor relationship during the budget preparation stage.
  • Research Compliance Review: Federal regulations and University policies require that various University committees approve certain proposed activities.  Compliance review and approvals for Animal and Human Subjects, Radioactive Substances, Bio-hazardous Substances, Controlled Substances, and Recombinant DNA may be necessary before your proposal can be signed.  These areas should be designated on the Internal Proposal Review Form.  Please refer to the Research Compliance section of this website for specific compliance office contacts who can assist with any approvals necessary for your proposal.
  • Optional items: The proposal contents listed below are fairly standard items required by many sponsors and may be included as part of your proposal:
    • A table of contents
    • Bibliography of pertinent literature
    • Vitae of all senior personnel
    • Recent publications
    • List of collaborators
    • Active and pending support (generally, sponsors request information on current (active/awarded) and pending support to evaluate potential scientific and/or commitment overlaps; this list should be complete including all support whether or not that support is funded through the University)
    • Description of available facilities and equipment

Development

The Pre-Award Team within the Office of the Vice President supports faculty, staff, and graduate students in their research and creative endeavors. Working with faculty and staff to increase external funding and to provide opportunities for professional growth is critical to the overall health of the University. We are here to help, so contact us early!

Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Public Accessibility Request Form

  • Welcome to the FCOI Public Accessibility Request form. Please complete this form to request information on a FCOI indentified on or after 8/24/12 related to Senior/Key investigators associated with a Public Health Service (PHS) funded award.

    If you need assistance in identifying the sponsor's award number and/or precise spelling of the Senior/Key investigator's name, please access the National Institutes of Health's RePORT tool for assistance at: https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm or https://report.nih.gov/

    Please enter the information below. Required fields necessary to process your request are marked (*):

  • Part A. Information About You

  • Part B. Information About Your Request

  • Format: 1R01CA012345-01
  • By checking the below box, I confirm that I am a member of the public requesting access to the above information.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

FCOI Electronic Submission System

System Access

Instructions for Investigators

  • To access self-service handouts with step-by-step instructions on how to perform various functions within the UConn InfoEd External Interests system, see: How-To Guides and Materials

Tips on completing a disclosure form

  • You will receive an e-mail invitation to complete a disclosure in InfoEd when your financial disclosure is due to expire.
  • Instructions on how to log-in (and a link to the system) are included in the e-mail invitation.
  • Use your UConn NetID username (e.g., abc12345) and password credentials to login. For NetID assistance, visit https://netid.uconn.edu/ for assistance looking up and resetting your UConn NetID password.
  • Move around the disclosure form by using the Next and Back buttons at the top of the page.
  • Save as you go using the Save button in the upper right corner.
  • Exit the form without submitting by closing the window (be sure to Save first). Return again later.
  • Any of the questions marked with a red asterisk (*) must be completed before a page can move forward. If any items are missing, a Mandatory Questions window will appear (click on each question to navigate to that item).  Missing items are also outlined in red.
  • To skip around previously-completed sections, use the hyperlinked navigation buttons at the top of the page (under the University’s logo) to move to that page on the form (e.g., TRAINING, SCREENING, etc).
  • Be sure to submit the form on the CERTIFICATION & SUBMISSION page by clicking the Certify and Submit button when you have finished completing your disclosure.
  • You will receive an email after submitting your disclosure.

Contacts for questions and assistance

  • Questions regarding the form or the disclosure requirements may be sent to fcoi@uconn.edu.  You may also contact an FCOI Research Compliance Monitor directly.
  • If you experience technical issues while completing your disclosure in InfoEd, please contact the eRA Help Desk at era-support@uconn.edu or 860.486.7944 (Mon-Fri, 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM).