Trying to find the contact information for a specific staff member by name? Search the appropriate University telephone directories:
uconn
InfoEd FAQs
Limited Submission Competitions
Limited Submission Overview
Limited Submission Competitions
Limited Submissions – Frequently Asked Questions
InfoEd Proposal Tracking
InfoEd offers investigators and administrators easy access to a host of information regarding their sponsored projects. Key features include the ability to track project funding status, research compliance approval status and requested/awarded revenue. For more information about use of InfoEd at UConn and access to How To guides, visit the InfoEd page. To login to the system, visit https://www.infoed.uconn.edu using your UConn NetID username and password.
NIH eRA Commons
The eRA Commons system is an online interface where grant applicants, grantees, and grantor agencies can access and share administrative information relating to research grants as they are received by NIH via ASSIST or Grants.gov. The eRA system allows Principal Investigators to track their applications; view summary statements and score letters; view notice of awards; submit just in time information; access eSNAP Progress Reports, Financial Status Reports and final closeout reports; and no-cost extensions.
eRA Commons registration is required prior to initiating an NIH proposal. To register for an eCommons account, complete the NIH eCommons Account Registration Form below. If you already have an ID and password, click on the second link below to login to eRA Commons.
NIH & Grants.gov
The University of Connecticut is already registered with Grants.gov. Investigators and departmental personnel need not register. NIH provides guidance on submitting applications through Grants.gov at the following sites:
Instructions for Routing NIH Proposals via Grants.gov. Internal paperwork must be routed through SPS before it is submitted electronically through Grants.gov.
- The routing process should be initiated 5 business days before the deadline date. This allows SPS to review and approve the proposal prior to submission.
- The proposal will not be submitted electronically to NIH until SPS receives the complete proposal package, and it has been reviewed and approved. The “complete proposal package” consists of:
- Internal Proposal Review Form with signatures
- Budget and Budget Justification
- Grants.gov application
The PI does not submit the proposal to NIH. Only SPS has the authority to submit the proposal to NIH after receiving full access permission from the PI.
- The PI will complete the electronic application and email to preaward@uconn.edu.
- SPS will print the application, review for compliance with application instructions and request additional information and/or corrections as necessary.
- The PI will be notified when the application has been reviewed and approved.
- The final version must be reviewed prior to submission.
The Principal Investigator may submit a draft application to SPS for review and approval. The PI may submit draft attachments in the application for review and continue to update their science during the review process.The final application should be submitted to SPS 2 business days before the deadline date.
Do not wait until the last minute to deliver the final proposal package.
The grants.gov server has been known to “bog down,” particularly on deadline dates. This may result in missing the deadline.
Remember: Submission to Grants.gov and the NIH is a multi-step process. Grants.gov processes a series of validations prior to sending the application to the NIH. NIH, in turn, processes a series of business process validations prior to accepting the application.
A series of email messages will be sent to the PI and SPS when the proposal is submitted via Grants.gov.
The PI must have an eRA Commons account in order for the application to be validated by NIH. Once an application completes validation by Grants.gov, it is sent to the NIH. In order for the application to be validated by the NIH, each PI must have an eCommons account (Credential Log-In) in the NIH eRA Commons system.
If the application meets NIH validation requirements, the application is posted in the PI’s eRA eCommons account. The PI and SPS need to check the assembled application in eCommons to ensure the application is complete and has no system conversion issues. If the application did not meet NIH validation requirements and errors were generated, a corrected application must be submitted prior to the submission deadline. If warnings were generated upon validation and the PI would like to address, the previous application must be rejected and a corrected application must be submitted prior to the submission deadline.
Additional information for NIH submission:
Fastlane
NSF FastLane
FastLane, NSF’s interactive real-time grant management system, is used to conduct NSF business over the internet. Research.gov registration is required prior to initiating an NSF proposal. To register for an account, complete the Account Registration Form below. Once completed, SPS will receive an email notification for Research.gov and approve the registration. Step-by-step instructions can be found in the Account Registration Guide. If you already have an ID and password, click on the second link below to login to Fastlane.
- Account Registration Form
- Login to FastLane
- Fastlane Proposal Preparation
- FAQs on Proposal Preparation
- FastLane Help
Instructions for Routing NSF Proposals via FastLane
Internal paperwork must be routed through SPS before the proposal is submitted electronically through NSF Fastlane.
- The routing process should be initiated 5 business days before the deadline date. This allows SPS to review and approve the proposal prior to electronic submission through NSF FastLane.
- The proposal will not be submitted electronically to NSF until SPS receives, reviews, and approves the “complete proposal package.” The “complete proposal package” consists of:
- Internal Proposal Review Form with signatures
- Budget and Budget Justification
- Access to Fastlane application
The PI does not submit the proposal to NSF. Only SPS has the authority to submit the proposal to NSF after receiving full access permission from the PI. The PI may only “Allow SRO [Sponsored Research Office, i.e. SPS] Access.”
- The PI will complete the electronic proposal in Fastlane and “Allow SRO Access”. SPS will print the proposal, review for compliance with proposal guidelines, and request additional information and/or corrections as necessary.
- The PI will be notified when the application has been reviewed and approved.
- The PI will notify SPS when the proposal is finalized and is ready for submission.
- The final version must be reviewed by SPS prior to submission.
Understand the different levels of allowing SRO Access.
Pressing the “Allow SRO Access” button within FastLane directs the PI to a screen entitled “SRO Access Control,” where the PI should choose one of three options:
- Allow SRO to only view proposal but not submit.
- Allow SRO to view and edit but not submit proposal.
- Allow SRO to view, edit and submit proposal.
The third option can be activated by the PI at any stage of the proposal. Selecting the third option will not be interpreted by SPS as a signal to submit the proposal to NSF unless the PI previously indicated otherwise. The PI should contact SPS when the proposal has been finalized and is ready for submission.
The Principal Investigator may continue to edit a proposal after granting SRO Access. Remember: two events need to occur before SPS will submit a proposal to NSF:
- SPS must receive and approve the complete proposal package, as described above.
- From within the “SRO Access Control” interface, the PI must select the third option, “Allow SRO to view, edit and submit proposal.”
Do not wait until the last minute to deliver the proposal package or “Allow SRO Access.”
The FastLane server has been known to “bog down,” particularly on deadline dates. This may result in missing the deadline, in which case the PI would need to seek an extension from the Program Officer. An email message will be sent to the PI when the proposal has been submitted via FastLane.
Instructions for Submitting Subawards to NSF
All UConn personnel who plan to submit subaward budgets via FastLane must first be registered FastLane users. If you are not a registered user, please complete SPS’ online registration form (see link above). Participation as a subawardee entails two distinct administrative responsibilities.
1. FastLane Portion
- The PI from the Lead Institution assigns a Personal Identification Number (PIN) to the proposal and then shares that PIN and Proposal ID with the UConn subaward applicant.
- The UConn subaward applicant then logs in with last name, NSF ID, FastLane password, and the PIN and Proposal ID#. This provides access to the Llead Institution’s proposal and enables full functionality including the uploading of budgets, letters of support, biographical sketches, and etcetera.
2. UConn Portion. In addition to FastLane requirements, there are several documents that the UConn subaward applicant is required to submit to SPS for review and approval:
- Internal Proposal Review Form with signatures
- Signed Significant Financial Interest Disclosure Forms for all key personnel
- Completed Cooperating Institution Consortium Statement
- Budget and Budget Justification
- Scope of Work – a narrative description of the subawardee’s role in the lead institution’s project.
NSF Data Management Plan Requirements
Effective for all new NSF applications received by NSF on and after January 18th, 2011. All applications that lack a data management plan will be returned without review.
Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results
NSF Data Sharing Policy
Investigators are expected to share with other researchers, at no more than incremental cost and within a reasonable time, the primary data, samples, physical collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in the course of work under NSF grants. Grantees are expected to encourage and facilitate such sharing.
NSF Data Management Plan Requirements
Proposals submitted or due on or after January 18, 2011, must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled “Data Management Plan”. This supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results.
Requirements by Directorate, Office, Division, Program, or other NSF Unit
For the specific information related to NSF data management plans and Directorate requirements, visit: Data Management Plans
-
Data Management Plans for Collaborative Proposals
Simultaneously submitted collaborative proposals and proposals that include subawards are a single unified project and should include only one supplemental combined Data Management Plan, regardless of the number of non-lead collaborative proposals or subawards included. Fastlane will not permit submission of a proposal that is missing a Data Management Plan. Proposals for supplementary support to an existing award are not required to include a Data Management Plan.
Data Management & Sharing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) (updated November 30, 2010)
National Science Foundation (NSF) Cost Sharing Policy Guidance
NSF policy states that the inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited in all proposals except when required in the NSF solicitation. SPS has guidance available to assist you during proposal preparation and to help to ensure that applications are compliant with NSF and University policy including situations where senior personnel do not request salary for their effort on the project.
Additional information regarding NSF submissions
- Guide to NSF Programs/Browse Funding Opportunities
- Program Deadlines by Date
- NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide
- News from NSF
- NSF Revised Cost Sharing Policy
- FAQs on Revised Cost Sharing Policy
Grants.gov Proposal Overview
The federal government established Grants.gov as a central web-based portal for inviting and receiving applications to its 26 federal grant-making agencies. Grants.gov lists all federal grant opportunities and provides a mechanism for applying for those opportunities.
Available search and notification features include:
- Receive Grant Opportunity Notifications.Use the Email Subscription feature within Grants.gov to register to receive email notifications of new grant postings. Select the appropriate email subscription option. Enter your email address and other required information if applicable. Click the “Subscribe to Mailing List” button.
- Find Grant Opportunities.Use the Search Grants feature within Grants.gov to locate possible funding opportunities. Once you have located the opportunity you want to apply to, select and open. Make note of the CFDA and/or solicitation number (also known as Funding Opportunity Number).
- Receive Notifications of Changes to Grant Opportunity.To receive notification of any changes to the opportunity, enter your e-mail address and submit prior to downloading the application and instructions. You will be e-mailed if the opportunity is changed and republished on Grants.gov before its closing date.
Useful links:
Grants.gov Support (available 24 hours day, 7 days a week)
Electronic Proposal Systems
Over the past decade, the research community has experienced a vast movement toward an increasingly paperless environment. This paradigm shift in which the administrative aspects of sponsored projects are conducted electronically is referred to as Electronic Research Administration, or eRA. Research administration professionals who engage in eRA interact with a number of both external systems (e.g. sponsor agency systems, government systems, etc.) and internal systems. While specific systems vary in complexity, scope and business function, the eRA concept applies to the entire sponsored project lifecycle.
Research Development
The goals of the Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) Research Development programs are to:
- help faculty in all disciplines move into a better position to generate external funding for their scholarly and creative activities
- enhance the research climate at the University of Connecticut by promoting faculty research
The OVPR provides Research Development Services through:
- proposal development services
- grant writing seminars and workshops
- internal funding seed programs
- limited submission funding opportunity management
- research communications
Partnering with Industry
The OVPR is your home for all industry-sponsored research activities.
We would like to work with you and your industry partners to ensure that our collaborative research discussions are productive, that negotiations are successful, and that both parties’ needs are met. We also ensure that agreements are in accordance with University policies and procedures as well as federal regulations and requirements.
We’ve prepared a document that outlines our philosophy and that may be useful to share with your industrial partners.
Contact us. Bring us in early. We are here to help!
Export Control Agreements
Export control laws are federal regulations that govern how certain information, technologies, and commodities can be transmitted overseas or to a foreign national on U.S. soil. The scope of the regulations is broad: they cover exports in virtually all fields of science, engineering, and technology and apply to research activities regardless of the source of funding. Failure to comply with these laws can have serious consequences, both for the institution and for the individual researcher. Potential penalties include fines and possibly imprisonment. It is thus critical for UConn researchers to understand their obligations under these regulations and to work with Research Compliance Services to ensure that the University is in compliance.
Please visit this section in the Research Integrity & Regulatory Affairs area of the website for more information.
