uconn

Safety in Research

“The way we conduct research, engage our students, and prepare the next generation of scholars requires that we ensure the health and well-being of all involved. Strengthening and supporting a culture of safety is as important to our discovery enterprise as is peer review, publication, grant writing, mentoring, and educating; it is integral to the responsible conduct of research…Safety is a critical component of scholarly excellence…Good science is safe science.” APLU Council on Research (2016).

UConn is dedicated to promoting a culture of safety and provides resources and mechanisms to support researchers in conducting safe, responsible, and successful research activities:

The Department of Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) provides comprehensive services in the fields of biological safety, chemical safety, occupational safety, radiation safety, and environmental health. EHS maintains and administers programs that combine training, consultation, control, and inspection to protect the health and safety of the University community and to ensure regulatory compliance and adherence to University policies and recognized standards.

Research Integrity & Compliance works to promote safety and regulatory compliance in research by maintaining faculty lead oversight committees.  The safety committees supported by this office include:

Research Misconduct

The University of Connecticut is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in the performance, reporting, reviewing and proposing of research and scholarly activity.  To this end, it is the responsibility of all faculty, staff, students, trainees and visiting scientists to refrain from and prevent research misconduct.

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.

  • Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
  • Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
  • Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results or words without giving appropriate credit. Authorship disputes are not defined as plagiarism in this policy.

Research misconduct does not include honest errors or differences of opinion.

It is also the responsibility of the research community to report suspected incidents of research misconduct.

Policies

Policy on Alleged Misconduct in Research

Non-Retaliation Policy

Resources

The following is a list of videos on research misconduct and integrity from the US Office of Research Integrity.

The Lab, Avoiding Research Misconduct – In this interactive movie, you can choose an alter-ego and become a graduate student, post doc, PI or RIO, and make decisions facing you in a case of data falsification. Decisions that can have long-term consequences on your career. The movie addresses topics such as avoiding research misconduct, mentorship, data stewardship, authorship, and more. The movie has versions in English, Spanish and Chinese.

The Research Clinic – In this movie, you can become a PI, a clinical research coordinator, a research assistant, or an institutional review board (IRB) chair, and make decisions that protect research subjects and avoid research misconduct.

Internal Funding Opportunities – Overview

The Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) supports faculty research, scholarship, and creative endeavors through a wide range of internal funding programs.  OVPR internal grants serve as high-leverage, strategic investments in outstanding faculty research projects that are at critical stages of development.  Our internal funding mechanisms are designed to competitively identify projects that fit our key funding criteria–projects that meet the highest disciplinary standards for excellence and are at a “tipping point” where specific work can lead to breakthroughs, external funding, and/or significant recognition. Recognizing that those crucial moments occur at various stages of the research process (and require different levels of funding to address, depending on your discipline), OVPR internal funding programs include large and small dollar mechanisms that focus on seed funding, completion/publication funding, and commercialization funding.

If you are a UConn/UConn Health faculty member who has a project that is ready to move to the next level, we invite you to browse our program guidelines to learn more.  You are also welcome to contact us (research@uconn.edu) to ask questions and to discuss which mechanisms are best suited to meet your needs.

The OVPR-Research Development Services (OVPR-RDS) team is excited to host (virtual) Teams Internal Funding Office Hours where faculty can share their novel seed grant project ideas and ask questions about the internal funding competitions.

Click to sign up for a time slot

Office hours for all awards are:

  • Tuesdays, 10 a.m. to noon
  • Wednesdays, 2 to 4 p.m.

 

Overview of FY 25 – FY 26 Internal Funding Opportunity Timelines (Last updated 8/8/24)

Program

Applications open

Applications due (12 noon)

Target for Notifications

Scholarship Facilitation Fund – SFF Spring (Storrs/Regional Campuses only) FY25 7/1/2024 12/1/2024 12/31/2024
SPARK Commercialization Technology fund – SPARK FY25 9/16/2024 10/28/2024 (LOI) – 1/20/2025 (Full proposal due by invitation only) 3/2025
Research Excellence Program –REP FY25 9/16/2024 12/16/2024 5/2025
Scholarship and Collaboration in Humanities and Arts Research – SCHARP FY25 9/16/2024 12/16/2024 5/2025
Scholarship Facilitation Fund – SFF Fall (Storrs/Regional Campuses only) FY26 1/6/2025
6/1/2025 6/30/2025
UConn Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI FY25) Research Initiative 1/6/2025 3/3/2025 6/2025
Convergence Awards for Research in Interdisciplinary Centers – CARIC FY26 TBD TBD TBD
Clinical Research and Innovation Seed Program – CRISP FY26 TBD TBD TBD

 

Table Key:

Complete / not yet open
Open for Applications In Review

Useful Links

 

Open Source – External Resources & Tools

General Information

What is Open Source?

Open Source Licenses

Overview of Standard/Popular Licenses

Generally Accepted Licenses

Open Source License Selection

Choosing an Appropriate License

License Differentiator – Interactive License Selection Tool

Tabular Comparison of License Terms

Software Licenses in Plain English

 

License Compatibility

 

Example Page

This is a <h1> tag

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras tincidunt imperdiet interdum. Nullam vitae pulvinar dui. Aliquam eget scelerisque massa, et eleifend odio. Phasellus at pretium dolor. Donec eget mauris eu massa aliquet tristique ut ultricies felis. Maecenas interdum, diam ut tempor suscipit, felis mdssdsdfauris iaculis orci, ac consectetur sem tortor non nunc. Aliquam vitae rutrum neque, id vestibulum erat. Donec placerat volutpat leo quis posuere. Aliquam sit amet metus dui.

This is a <h2> tag

Aenean eleifend lorem id ipsum auctor eleifend. Nulla id dolor dui. Aenean accumsan dolor ut lacus pretium, ac faucibus felis sagittis. Donec faucibus sed est a facilisis. Curabitur in est dignissim, egestas ligula et, fringilla arcu. Morbi ut dictum felis. Ut nec dolor tellus. Nullam sagittis odio urna. Nunc rhoncus neque non magna placerat tincidunt. Donec quis tristique sem, sit amet dapibus urna. Nulla viverra nec nisl a egestas. Nullam sed placerat tellus. Proin dui massa, venenatis et ipsum in, pretium luctus elit.

This is a <h3> tag

Phasellus viverra vulputate facilisis. Quisque volutpat, dolor sed facilisis dignissim, turpis ante consequat quam, non tempus libero nunc euismod leo. Aenean lorem justo, interdum in diam congue, pretium vestibulum neque. Integer pharetra turpis a ante posuere cursus. Donec sit amet aliquam lacus, vel blandit massa. Phasellus lectus erat, porta nec sem et, venenatis efficitur ex. Cras sem risus, tincidunt sit amet nibh sed, pharetra molestie urna. Sed sollicitudin justo ligula, ac mollis ligula euismod vitae.

This is a <h4> tag

Cras a aliquet enim. Curabitur non purus turpis. Nunc facilisis, tortor vitae ultrices sollicitudin, ipsum lacus auctor risus, sit amet mattis nunc nisi eu augue. Vestibulum vel sem eu erat posuere mollis. Donec pellentesque lacinia mi, vitae blandit ex venenatis quis. Curabitur dignissim neque vitae sapien pellentesque consectetur. Aenean in eros nibh. Duis pellentesque libero sapien, eu porttitor arcu suscipit id. Mauris pretium facilisis accumsan. Pellentesque vehicula metus ipsum, sit amet volutpat metus faucibus et. Fusce hendrerit erat eget ante posuere faucibus. Ut porttitor, nisl id dignissim ultrices, nibh libero gravida ipsum, et feugiat dolor arcu at lorem. Maecenas vel convallis sapien.

This is a <h5> tag

Fusce id vehicula tortor. Sed sed diam tincidunt magna convallis ullamcorper id a lectus. Aenean faucibus vulputate tincidunt. Ut maximus magna non dui consequat ultrices. Mauris vitae tellus ac purus condimentum sollicitudin. Nulla volutpat enim quis metus tincidunt cursus. Curabitur id turpis in arcu placerat convallis.

This is a <h6> tag

Aenean eleifend lorem id ipsum auctor eleifend. Nulla id dolor dui. Aenean accumsan dolor ut lacus pretium, ac faucibus felis sagittis. Donec faucibus sed est a facilisis. Curabitur in est dignissim, egestas ligula et, fringilla arcu. Morbi u

This is preformatted text right here

Aenean eleifend lorem id ipsum auctor eleifend. Nulla id dolor dui. Aenean accumsan dolor ut lacus pretium, ac faucibus felis sagittis. Donec faucibus sed est a facilisis. Curabitur in est dignissim, egestas ligula et, fringilla arcu. Morbi u

dog tester
Dog running and doing its dog-things

IPB at UConn Tech Park

The Innovation Partnership Building (IPB), an 113,700 square foot research building, officially opened its doors in 2018. The unique facility boasts state-of-the-art specialized equipment and instrumentation for nanofabrication, precision manufacturing, biomedical devices/sensor development, advanced modeling/simulation and material characterization.  The IPB serves a nexus of intellectual, physical and cyber assets intended to foster industry-academic partnerships for research, innovation technology commercialization and job growth for the State of Connecticut.

For more information visit techpark.uconn.edu

Innovation Partnership Building
Innovation Partnership Building

Starting a Company

A startup is a new business entity formed to commercialize one or more related intellectual properties. Forming a startup business is an alternative to licensing the IP to an established business.  There are several factors you should consider to determine if a startup is viable path. Examples include:

  • Idea-Team-Plan Trifecta.  A successful start-up evolves around three key ingredients:  (1) a new idea, supported by initial data, (2) an experienced team to develop and deliver technical and business goals, and (3) a business plan that serves as a road map.
  • Not every great idea needs to be a company.  Consider alternative paths, such as partnership, co-development, licensing, and more.
  • Execution Risk.  While having a new idea is necessary for creating a startup, it is not sufficient for its success. It requires focused team-work, and willingness to take in advice and to pivot when necessary.
  • Competition and Collaboration.  Two key elements to be fully aware of and respond to with a dynamic approach.
  • Funding.  How much capital is required to deliver various milestones, what sources to pursue, and Return on Investment (ROI)?
  • Market Size and Dynamic.  Is the market large enough and is it a stable, shrinking or expanding market?
  • Revenue and Exit.  What is the revenue projection and potential key opportunities for exit?

TCS Venture Development can help to determine if a startup company is viable, and will advise on other key issues relating to starting a company. The choice to establish a new company for commercializing intellectual property is a joint decision made by TCS and the inventors. If a new business startup is chosen as the preferred commercialization path, TCS can assist you and the other founders in meeting investors, consultants and entrepreneurs and accessing other resources at UConn to advise you in founding the company. It is advisable for inventors to have agreements regarding their roles with the startup reviewed by their own counsel to ensure that all personal ramifications – including taxation and liabilities – are clearly understood.

The general process for the selection of potential technologies for a university startup includes a review of inventions based on criteria such as:

  • Technology novelty, supported with initial data
  • The market size
  • The technology can be adequately protected through patents, copyright or trademark to create barriers that make market entry difficult for competitors.
  • The technology is scalable.
  • The estimate of the net present value of the return (less the costs of getting the business going) is much greater than the value that can be obtained by executing a typical license with an existing company.
  • Is a prototype/proof of concept available?
  • Do the inventors have a reasonable understanding of what is required to build a business, and what their roles may be?
  • Does the business model have a visible path to profitability?
  • Are the initial management and financing needs reasonably clear?

TCS Assistance:

  • Early stage involvement. TCS Venture Development staff is actively involved in the early stages of the company formation and work with their network of professionals to develop a business plan and find initial management, space and other critical elements. In some cases, the advisors and Executives In Residence (EIRs) may take on interim management roles to facilitate the accomplishments of key milestones, such as drafting a business plan, meeting with venture capital firms or angel investors to obtain funding and assisting with a liquidity event.
  • Business/financing assistance.  TCS Venture Development staff can provide business help and/or financing advice.  We have several programs for assisting in market research, business planning and the set-up of new companies including a business incubator that offers space and business services and the Business School’s Innovation Accelerator where MBA students and faculty undertake semester-long projects.
  • Connections with industry partners.  TCS Venture Development helps to connect researchers and industry partners.  We strive to connect external entrepreneurs and businesses with collaborators within a university or to identify resources that will help them advance their technologies and business interests. Many opportunities to create mutually beneficial projects between university researchers and regional tech entrepreneurs can be initiated thanks to this ability to efficiently connect.
    • TCS serves in a liaison role.  External businesses and entrepreneurs are invited to contact TCS Venture Development staff and discuss their initiatives, needs, goals and objectives. TCS works with these clients to understand the key issues and to determine if there are opportunities to develop mutually beneficial working relationships and projects. Venture Development staff can provide business help and/or financing advice.
    • Establishes projects that advance businesses toward commercial success.  These projects are selected to align with UConn research interests, such that as early-stage companies achieve success, they are well positioned to strengthen their collaborations with UConn researchers. These projects are also selected based on the ability to generate positive economic development outcomes in the region. Typical engagements include market research projects on behalf of small firms who are applying for SBIR grants that, if successful, will lead to opportunities to engage UConn researchers and their graduate students on larger development programs. UConn faculty who are interested in reaching out to small technology businesses in the state are encouraged to contact TCS.
  • Incubator program. UConn’s Technology Incubation Program (“TIP”) is part of TCS.  TIP offers new companies that have a technology linkage or synergistic relationship with UConn the ability to be located on campus and access resources that could be otherwise unattainable for a fledgling company. TCS supports the incubation process offering lab and office facilities on campus, business-planning resources, and access to faculty experts, expensive instrumentation and specialized equipment. In some cases TCS clients are working with UConn technology and others have their own intellectual property.  TIP provides the following services to startup companies:
    • Investment Network – Access to various sources of capital available within CT and other locations, through direct introduction, office-hours with investors and public and private events.
    • Library and Computer Network – Access to UConn Libraries, the largest public research collection in the state. The University of Connecticut Libraries provide users with intellectual content that fulfills their academic and research needs through electronic and physical access.
    • Equipment/Instrumentation – Some of the departments and faculty have large and expensive specialized items of equipment. TCS’s incubator helps negotiate agreements between the relevant faculty and the company, given that time is available on the instrument and client employees have been properly trained.
    • Business Support – Through a network of service providers and advisors, TIP provides a variety of business consultants including accountants, lawyers and subject matter experts to help with issues important to startup companies. TCS staff can support business plan development and financial planning. TCS organizes educational and networking events to promote collaboration among faculty and company scientists, to provide exposure to experienced entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial resources, and to assist through connections with advisors and mentors. Through the School of Business, TIP can arrange access to knowledgeable faculty and students able to conduct business development projects for emerging companies. Learn about our TIP program.

For additional resources to help you start your business, see our Startup Guidebook.

Licensing

Once a faculty discovery has been patented, that’s not the end of the line!  The next step is to find an industry partner who would like to license the technology.

Marketing a technology:

TCS uses many sources and strategies to identify potential licensees and market inventions. Sometimes existing relationships of the inventors, TCS and other researchers are useful in marketing an invention. Market research can also assist in identifying prospective licensees. In addition, we also examine other complimentary technologies and agreements to assist our efforts. Faculty publications and presentations are often excellent marketing tools as well.

Licensees can be identified in many ways. First, the inventors are often aware of the commercial companies who would be interested in the work. Industry-specific marketing efforts, including trade show participation, affiliations and market research carried out by TCS, also seek to identify potential licensees. Additionally, issued patents listed by the USPTO can provide names of companies who currently have patents similar in nature; often these can prove to be potential licensees.

How you can help:

Your active involvement can dramatically improve the chances of matching an invention to an outside company. Studies have shown that 70% of licensees were known to the inventors. Thus research and consulting relationships are often a valuable source for licensees. Your research and consulting relationships are often helpful in both identifying potential licensees and technology champions within companies. Once interested companies are identified, the inventor is the best person to describe the details of the invention and its technical advantages. The most successful technology transfer results are obtained when the inventor and TCS Licensing Director work together as a team to market and promote use of the technology.

Working with industry:

Marketing technology to a potential licensee will usually require that a Confidentiality Agreement be established.  The OVPR can negotiate these agreements for you and has the legal authority from the University to do so. Confidentiality Agreements, named Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDAs), are agreements between UConn and an outside entity (company, person). These are used to facilitate discussions of information that the parties wish to keep out of the public view. For companies, sharing of their business needs can lead to developing solutions with UConn personnel; however, they may not want such needs to be known to their competitors. For UConn, maintaining confidentiality can preserve patent rights to inventions. Many university offices and the programs of OVPR can provide NDAs/CDAs and can ensure proper agreements are put in place.

Once their evaluation is completed, the potential partner may want to discuss the terms of a license. TCS will negotiate the terms of the license with input from the inventor regarding valuation, and other obligations, that occur in such legally binding agreements. Other terms that are included in a license include exclusivity versus non-exclusivity, world-wide rights versus rights in only some territories, all fields of use versus restricted fields of use, and many other considerations. On occasion, we will sign an option agreement, which gives a company the right to evaluate the technology for a limited time prior to making a decision about licensing (usually 6 months – 1 year). The TCS is experienced in negotiating contracts and is the designated legal authority from the University to do so. If a potential partner asks what kinds of terms the University would want in a license, please refer them to TCS.

Agreement Management:

TCS tracks the progress of the licensee towards milestones and goals established in the signed agreement. Licenses usually state that technology progress reports must be submitted regularly until a product hits the market. Some companies will fund research and development of the technology at UConn in the inventor’s lab. Others may offer a consulting position to the inventor as they develop a product at the licensee’s facilities. TCS usually continues to manage the patents, if there are any, and will sometimes need to handle patent interferences, patent infringement or deal with arbitration or litigation surrounding a technology or a license. Once a product is offered for sale, then TCS requires quarterly reports and royalty payments from the licensee, although specific terms vary from license to license. Payouts are made according to the royalty sharing policy after UConn has recouped its out-of-pocket expenses, primarily the cost of obtaining patent protection.

License Back Policy:

If TCS decides not to pursue a patent on a technology, the inventors have the option to license back the technology. The license back is a legal agreement that enables the Inventor(s) to patent and commercialize technology developed at the University.

Royalty Sharing Policy: 

Inventor contribution percentages refer to the share of net royalty income that is split amongst the inventors; the standard disposition is equal sharing. However, it is up to the inventors to propose and agree on a different formula and communicate that agreement to TCS. This is accomplished by filling out the back of the Invention Disclosure Form. Invention-related income is allocated based on the university’s Royalty Sharing Policy.

 

If you have any questions please contact us!

Gregory Gallo, Director, Technology Transfer

Donna Cyr, Director of Licensing, Physical Sciences & Engineering

Lindsay Sanford, Director of Licensing, Engineering

Amit Kumar, Director of Licensing, Business Development

or call us at 860.679.3992

Submission

Once the proposal is reviewed by the Pre-Award Specialist and all required documents are in place, the proposal is forwarded to the University’s authorized representative for review, approval and signature.  The signed proposal is then forwarded back to the Pre-Award Specialist. Submission to the sponsor is handled as follows:

Hardcopy (paper) submissions

  • Pre-Award Services returns all signed documents to the principal investigator and/or department administrator.
  • The principal investigator or department administrator submits the final approved proposal to the sponsor.
  • The principal investigator or departmental administrator forwards a full copy of the submitted proposal to Pre-Award Services at preaward@uconn.edu.
  • A full copy of the proposal is filed and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.

Electronic submissions NOT required by the University’s institutional representative

  • Pre-Award Services returns all signed documents to the principal investigator and/or department administrator.
  • The principal investigator or department administrator submits the final approved electronic proposal to the sponsor.
  • The principal investigator and/or department administrator monitors the proposal submission through sponsor acceptance of the proposal for review. If there are errors requiring correction to the proposal or application, the principal investigator and/or department administrator makes the necessary corrections and contacts Pre-Award Services to review and approve.
  • The principal investigator or departmental administrator forwards a full copy of the submitted proposal to PreAward Services at preaward@uconn.edu.
  • A full copy of the proposal is filed and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.

Electronic submissions required by the University’s institutional representative:

  • Pre-Award Services submits the final approved electronic proposal to the sponsor.
  • Pre-Award Services forwards all submission notifications and confirmations to the principal investigator and/or department administrator.
  • Pre-Award Services, the principal investigator and/or department administrator monitors the proposal submission through sponsor acceptance of the proposal for review. If there are errors requiring correction, the principal investigator and/or department administrator makes the necessary corrections and contacts Pre-Award Services to resubmit.
  • A full copy of the proposal is filed and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.

Budget Justification

The proposal budget is the financial plan of action that reflects the costs required to perform the proposed work statement. It is important to demonstrate that the budget proposed is reasonable.  A budget justification should be submitted in order to allow each budget item to be explained relative to the proposed research.  The specifics of the sponsoring agency’s budgetary guidelines should be followed carefully.  Budgets should be prepared for the entire proposed project. Both direct and F & A costs should be identified in the budget.

Budgeting

The proposal budget is the financial plan of action that reflects the costs required to perform the proposed work statement.  The following information has been prepared to help you develop your budget plan.  See our Budgeting and Costing Guide for current information on fringe benefits, graduate stipends, Facilities and Administration (F&A) rates (Indirect Costs) and other budgetary matters.

It is important to demonstrate that the budget proposed is reasonable.  A budget justification should be submitted in order to allow each budget item to be explained relative to the proposed research.  The specifics of the sponsoring agency’s budgetary guidelines should be followed carefully.  Budgets should be prepared for the entire proposed project. Both direct and F & A costs should be identified in the budget.

Research Compliance

Research Integrity & Compliance Services (RICS)

Research Integrity & Compliance Services (RICS) oversees compliance requirements at the university related to research. Policies, procedures and guidelines are designed to support the responsible and ethical conduct of university research and to ensure adherence to all laws and regulations guiding research.  Major areas of compliance include:

  • Animal Subjects/IACUC
  • Human Subjects/IRB
  • Institutional Biosafety (biohazards, DNA, Select Agents, Dual Use research)
  • Research Ethics (COI, RCR, misconduct)
  • Research Safety and Security (biosafety Data use
  • Export Controls

For more information, please contact Research Integrity & Compliance Services

 

Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI)

The University requires, at a minimum, an annual disclosure from all faculty members regarding outside activities and financial interests.  At the time of proposal submission, investigators must completed their online FCOI disclosures in the InfoEd External Interests Module. Some sponsors require FCOI disclosures at the proposal stage and the University will not submit proposals until such disclosures have been completed.

All subrecipients must certify, at the proposal stage, that its institution has implemented and enforced an FCOI policy compliant with the respective regulations or that they lack a compliant FCOI policy and will implement a policy prior to subaward issuance.  Additionally, the responsible personnel at the subrecipient must complete and submit the External Investigator Disclosure Form.

For more information, please contact Financial Conflict of Interest

Proposal Contents

Most sponsors publish guidelines on how to prepare a proposal and the requirements.  The application package may also include forms that require a signature from an authorized official. Sponsor instructions should be followed carefully for format, content, and budget and submission requirements.

The following is a list of common proposal elements. If there are no sponsor guidelines these documents represent the minimum required by Pre-Award Services. For most sponsor agencies, proposals contain most or all of these elements.  (Specific agency guidelines, if available, should always be followed.)

  • Proposal guidelines from sponsoring agency or website link: assists with reviewing proposal and ensuring all sponsor requirements are met prior to submission.
  • Internal Proposal Review Form: complete for all proposals and secure signatures of the Principal Investigator, Co-Principal Investigator(s), Department Chair, Unit Head, and in some cases Dean as appropriate.
  • SPS Proposal Cover Page: complete if the sponsor does not provide a cover page for approval signature. Please refer to the Frequently Requested Information for assistance with completing the sponsor cover page. The University’s Authorized Representative signs all proposals on behalf of the University.
  • Proposal Narrative: describe the objectives, methodology and significance of the proposed project.
  • Budget Spreadsheet: provide a reasonable estimate of expenses for each budget category. Include cost sharing/matching only if specifically required by the funding agency. Please refer to the Budgeting and Costing Guide for assistance.
  • Budget Justification: provide a detailed explanation of all items listed in the budget. Please refer to the budget justification guide for assistance.
  • Electronic application (if applicable): provide a completed application or access to the completed application.
  • Subcontracts (if applicable): provide a statement of work, budget, budget justification, F&A Rate Agreement and Information and Compliance Form for Subrecipients, signed by an authorized official of that organization.  Please refer to the  Subaward Determination Guidance for assistance with determining the subrecipient versus contractor relationship during the budget preparation stage.
  • Research Compliance Review: Federal regulations and University policies require that various University committees approve certain proposed activities.  Compliance review and approvals for Animal and Human Subjects, Radioactive Substances, Bio-hazardous Substances, Controlled Substances, and Recombinant DNA may be necessary before your proposal can be signed.  These areas should be designated on the Internal Proposal Review Form.  Please refer to the Research Compliance section of this website for specific compliance office contacts who can assist with any approvals necessary for your proposal.
  • Optional items: The proposal contents listed below are fairly standard items required by many sponsors and may be included as part of your proposal:
    • A table of contents
    • Bibliography of pertinent literature
    • Vitae of all senior personnel
    • Recent publications
    • List of collaborators
    • Active and pending support (generally, sponsors request information on current (active/awarded) and pending support to evaluate potential scientific and/or commitment overlaps; this list should be complete including all support whether or not that support is funded through the University)
    • Description of available facilities and equipment

Development

The Pre-Award Team within the Office of the Vice President supports faculty, staff, and graduate students in their research and creative endeavors. Working with faculty and staff to increase external funding and to provide opportunities for professional growth is critical to the overall health of the University. We are here to help, so contact us early!