UConn FCOI policy
Federal FCOI Regulations
- Public Health Service (PHS)
- National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- Dept of Energy (DOE)
- NASA
The Financial Conflict of Interest in Research program supports the UConn (Storrs campus, four regional campuses, the School of Social Work, and the School of Law) research community with understanding and complying with University requirements related to financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) in research.
The role of the UConn/UConn Health Stem Cell Research Oversight (SCRO) Committee is to ensure that human embryonic stem cell (hESC) and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) research is well-justified and that inappropriate and/or unethical research is not conducted. Its mandate is to provide oversight of ethical issues related to the derivation and research use of human pluripotent stem cell lines at all schools, colleges, campuses, and research arms of the UConn/UConn Health per University policy, regardless of the source of funding. From a legal perspective, the review and approval of human embryonic stem cell research by a SCRO committee or its equivalent is required by the State of Connecticut. At a deeper level, SCRO committees exist to protect both the public interest and the progress of biomedical stem cell research. The ethical mandate of the SCRO Committee is to ensure that appropriate respect is given to the value of human life.
SCRO approval is required prior to any of the following:
Initial IACUC Training is a requirement for everyone working with live vertebrate animals at the University of Connecticut in accordance with the policies and guidelines set forth in the “Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (PHS 1986), the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (ILAR 2011), the USDA Animal Welfare Regulations (CFR 1985) and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching.”
Retraining is required for faculty PIs on a triennial basis (once every three years). All other animal users (staff, post-doctoral fellows, graduate students and undergraduates) must complete IACUC retraining on an annual basis.
The University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) requires that all faculty, staff and students who work with live vertebrate animals attend an initial IACUC training session. This will provide an overview of federal, state and University regulations, policies and procedures as well as general information related to the care and use of animals at the University.
The IACUC is currently updating the initial training and format to facilitate more timely completion by researchers. Until this updated online training is available, all new researchers must complete the “Working with the IACUC” Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Program course (www.citiprogram.org).
Instructions for CITI:
NOTE: IACUC Staff are automatically notified of completion of CITI courses. Thus, you do not need to email your completion certificate to the IACUC office. However, please contact the office with any questions (iacuc@uconn.edu).
The IACUC requires retraining for all animal users. Animal users must complete one of the following retraining options in order to receive approval for continued animal use:
The IACUC has members whose backgrounds & experience are relevant to the Committee’s responsibilities, including veterinarians, non-scientists, and scientists representing schools and colleges that use animals, as well as members who are not affiliated with the University in any way other than as a member of the IACUC.
The Institutional Official appoints IACUC members and members typically serve three-year terms. If you are interested in serving on the IACUC, please contact the Director of Research Compliance at iacuc@uconn.edu.
The University of Connecticut/Storrs has an Assurance of Compliance #D16-00077/A3124-01. It was most recently renewed and approved by the Office of Laboratory Welfare (OLAW) effective February 18, 2025 and is valid for a period of four years, expiring on February 28, 2028.
Those affiliated with animal research may access the University of Connecticut/Storrs PHS Assurance by going to this link.
University Policy: Animal Use in Research, Teaching and Testing
AW-01-2011: Reporting Animal Welfare Concerns and Incidents of Non-Compliance
AW-02-2012: Animal Transportation
AW-03-2012: Acclimation of Newly Arrived Research and Teaching Animals
AW-05-2011: Use of Non-Pharmaceutical Grade Compounds in Animals
AW-06-2011: Single Housing of Social Species
AW-07-2018: Housing Rats and Mice in Shared Spaces
AW-08-2018: Animal Housing Areas
AW-09-2018: Guillotine and Scissor Maintenance
AW-10-2018: Environmental Enrichment
BP-01-2010: Use of Full Committee Review (FCR)
BP-02-2012: Use of Designated Member Review (DMR)
BP-03-2012: Responsibilities of the Primary Reviewer
BP-06-2010: Requires Modifications to Secure Approval
BP-07-2012: Responsibilities of Full Voting Members
BP-08-2013: Biomedical vs. Agricultural Use of Agricultural Species
BP-09-2011: Veterinary Review of Protocols
BP-10-2011: Program Responsibilities: Attending Veterinarian
BP-11-2012: Annual Review of Protocols
BP-12-2012: Animal Welfare Investigation and Reporting
BP-13-2012: Post Approval Monitoring of Protocols
BP-14-2012: Semiannual Inspection of Facilities
BP-15-2012: EHS Review of Protocols
BP-16-2012: Pre-Review of Protocols
BP-17-2012: Administrative Changes to Protocols
BP-18-2012: Withholding Approval of Protocols
BP-20-2012: IACUC Emergency Business Practices
BP-21-2013: Suspension of Approved Animal Activities
BP-22-2012: IACUC-Safety Committee Coordination of Protocol Review
BP-26-2018: Modifications to Approved Animal Activities
BP-27-2022: Assessing and Reporting Protocol Deviations, Adverse Events or Unexpected Outcomes
BP-28-2022: Evaluating Scientific Rigor During Protocol Review
SI-01-2011: Use of Invertebrate Animals in Research and Teaching
SI-02-2012: Animal Transfer Between Protocols for Traditional Laboratory Species
SI-03-2010: Individuals Listed on Animal Protocols
SI-04-2010: Students Registered in Classes or Programs described in Protocols
SI-05-2011: Principal Investigator Responsibilities
SI-06-2011: Guidelines for Assigning Animals Into USDA Pain and Distress Categories
SI-07-2012: Activities Requiring IACUC Oversight
SI-08-2012: Animal Tracking for Animal Science General Husbandry Protocols
SI-09-2013: Regulation of Food or Fluid Intake
SI-10-2013: Determining Expiration Dates
SI-11-2012: Requirements for Personnel Listed on Protocols
SI-12-2020: Photography and Other Media Capture of Research Animals
SI-13-2021: Procurement of Animals for Research and Teaching
SI-14-2024: Protocol Oversight During Principal Investigator Absence
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols are reviewed once per month; the typical turnaround time from submission to approval is 6-8 weeks. Please allow sufficient time to secure approval when approvals are required to meet funding deadlines.
Protocols must be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format to iacuc@uconn.edu
| IACUC Meeting Date |
| Wednesday, December 17, 2025 |
| Wednesday, January 21, 2026 |
| Wednesday, February 11, 2026 |
| Wednesday, March 11, 2026 |
| Wednesday, April 8, 2026 |
| Wednesday, April 22, 2026 |
| Wednesday, May 13, 2026 |
| Wednesday, June 17, 2026 |
| Wednesday, July 15, 2026 |
| Wednesday, August 19, 2026 |
| Wednesday, September 9, 2026 |
| Wednesday, October 7, 2026 |
| Wednesday, October 21, 2026 |
| Wednesday, November 10, 2026 |
| Wednesday, December 9, 2026 |
Please note that a protocol submission must undergo thorough pre-review by IACUC staff and any necessary ancillary reviews (i.e., veterinarian, EHS) before it can be sent to a meeting for full committee review. We recommend you allow for 3-4 weeks for the pre-review process. All submissions must be ready for full committee review one week before the meeting date to be included on the agenda. While working on any submission, please keep review process in mind and reach out to iacuc@uconn.edu if there are any questions about what documents/information to include with a submission.
Federal Stop-Work or Grant Termination Directives
These guidelines are intended to assist investigators who may be at risk for or have received a directive from a federal funding agency to stop, pause, terminate or otherwise prematurely end a research study involving animals. Please contact the IACUC Office promptly if you receive a stop-work directive and/or would like to discuss further.
Concern for the welfare of animals used in research and teaching is the responsibility of all members of the University community. The University of Connecticut is committed to complying with all animal welfare regulations governing animals used in research and teaching. If you have concerns about animal welfare or non-compliance, please communicate them to the Attending Veterinarian, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) or Research Compliance Services (RCS). Non-compliant incidents of a serious nature (those which harm animals or threaten their health) should be reported immediately. Your anonymity will be protected; however, providing your contact information will allow us to contact you if we need additional information. The Animal Welfare Act protects the rights of individuals reporting animal welfare concerns and prohibits discrimination or reprisal for reporting violations of regulations or standards.
You may contact the Attending Veterinarian at acsinfo@uconn.edu or 860-486-2907
IACUC Office at iacuc@uconn.edu or 860-486-2459
Concerns can also be reported anonymously through the REPORTLINE by calling a toll-free number at (888) 685-2637 or via the REPORTLINE website. The REPORTLINE is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year operated by a private (non-UConn) company. You may contact the hotline to report a concern without giving your name. You will be able to re-contact the REPORTLINE to track your report to provide further information at a later date or to obtain general updates about the status of your concern.
The University welcomes and encourages good-faith reporting. As such, individuals who submit a report or participate in a compliance investigation in good faith are provided protection from retaliation per the University’s Non-Retaliation Policy.
Additional information on reporting concerns can be found at the Office of University Compliance website.
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is responsible for reviewing the University of Connecticut’s program for the humane care and use of animals in research and teaching as described in its Assurance and University Policy.
UConn has maintained full accreditation with AAALAC International since 2010. Our last full accreditation was given March 25, 2025. For more information about AAALAC and the accreditation process, please visit https://www.aaalac.org/.
The IACUC is created by and subject to federal law: the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (PHS 1986), the USDA Animal Welfare Act/Regulations (CFR 1985) and related Guides. Members include scientists and nonscientists, veterinarians and nonaffiliated individuals from the community. Members are appointed by the Institutional Official.
For information, visit IACUC Contacts page.
Form IRB-1: Protocol Application for the Involvement of Human Participants in Research: for Expedited or Full Board Review. Expedited and Full Board studies require the same level of review, so the same form is used for both types of review. See the next section to determine which level of review is required.
Form IRB-5: Request for Exemption from Continuing IRB Review. The IRB makes exemption determinations. This category requires initial IRB review, but the study is then exempt from continuing review. See the next section to determine which level of review is required.
Form IRB-7: Protocol Application for Research Methods Courses (RMC). Course Instructors must submit an application for IRB approval of the types of research projects to be conducted by students in the class. The IRB-7 protocol will receive expedited review.
Form IRB-9: Protocol Application for Ethnographic/Naturalistic Research. Ethnographic/naturalistic research activities may require expedited or full board review. The same form is used for both types of review. See the next section to determine which level of review is required.
Investigators make an initial determination for which type of review is appropriate for their study (full board, expedited, or exempt) and submit the required number of copies of the protocol and supporting documentation. Upon receipt, the IRB staff, in consultation with the Chair or an IRB member, screens the protocol to verify the investigator’s initial determination. The protocol is then placed into the appropriate queue for review. The Chair, or his/her designee, makes the final determination of the type of review required and the appropriate expedited or exempt category.
For more information on each type of review, please see:
Several factors affect the amount of time a review will take. These factors include how many other applications were received ahead of yours, whether all investigators on the application have completed the CITI training program, and whether the application is complete or if there is missing information required. The IRB reviews application in the order in which they were received. When a new application is received, the IRB Cover Page is stamped, and an IRB protocol number is assigned. The IRB Cover Page is returned to the Principal Investigator (or Correspondent) to verify receipt. From the date of receipt, the amount of time a review takes is as follows:
The consent discussion that takes place between an investigator and participant must be captured in a document called an “informed consent form”, or “consent form.” Ordinarily, all research participants must indicate in writing their willingness to participate in research by signing the consent form. However, signed consent may not be necessary or appropriate in certain studies, such as surveys, interviews and other minimal risk research, or in research where the participants are to remain anonymous. In these cases, the IRB gives an investigator permission to alter the consent process (waiver of signed consent), and the investigator should prepare an information sheet appropriate for the study. Federal regulations identify certain specific elements required for informed consent. Depending on the nature of the research, the IRB may require additional elements.
For more information, see Standard Consent and Documentation section of the IRB Policies and Procedures documentation.
Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Policy describes this Institution’s commitment to the protection of human participants at UConn-Storrs.
IRB Policies and Procedures describes how UConn-Storrs puts the various federal and local regulatory HRPP requirements into practice; refer to the following documents for updates:
This Researcher’s Guide provides investigators and students with information that will be helpful for meeting the standards set by the UConn IRB policies and by the Federal Regulations for the protection of human subjects in research.
Or go to each section in the guide: