Many grant-funded research collaborations involve issuing a subrecipient agreement (subaward or subcontract, depending upon UConn’s prime funding agreement) to collaborating institutions to provide a portion of the UConn grant award (which serves as “pass-through entity,” or PTE) to the collaborator/subrecipient. Contractor Purchase Orders, by contrast, are used to contract for consulting services. All grant-funded Subaward agreements are drafted by Sponsored Program Services (SPS) and provided to the Principal Investigator (PI) for review before they are sent to the subrecipient entity for signature. All grant-funded Contractor agreements for consulting services must be reviewed by Procurement Services and the PI before they are sent to the Contractor for execution.
The pass-through entity (PTE) is responsible for making case-by-case determinations to determine whether the entity receiving Federal funds is a subrecipient or a contractor. In determining whether an agreement between the issuing entity and another non-Federal entity is classified as a subrecipient or a contractor, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. All of the characteristics listed below may not be present in all cases, and UConn must use judgment in classifying each agreement appropriately.
Subrecipients – Per §200.1 a subrecipient is an entity that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such program. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency. In general, a subrecipient relationship with UConn will include the following characteristics (per §200.331):
Contractor – Per §200.1, a contract means a legal instrument by which a non-Federal entity conducts procurement transactions under a Federal award. In general, a contractor relationship with UConn will include the following entity characteristics (per §200.331):
Subaward agreement requests must be submitted to subawards@uconn.edu.
Contractor Agreement requests must be submitted to Procurement Services via the Hiring of a Consultant form
Or go to each section in the guide:
Animal Care Services (NetID restricted link) provides animal husbandry and veterinary care for vertebrate animals housed at the Storrs Campus, excluding the farm animals under the supervision of the Department of Animal Science. ACS veterinarians have University-wide responsibilities for assisting faculty and the IACUC in protocol review, facility inspections, and training. The Animal Care and Use Program is accredited by AAALAC International.
For further information, please contact acsinfo@uconn.edu.
The InfoEd eRA portal is secured with the UConn NetID single sign-on. All users are required to have a valid UConn NetID. UConn faculty and staff including UConn Health faculty and staff are automatically set up with an account. Graduate students and external users (e.g. UConn affiliates) should request access after obtaining an UConn NetID through University Information Technology Services (UITS).
If you still cannot access the InfoEd eRA portal after verifying your correct credentials and attempting to login, contact the eRA Help Desk at 860.486.7944 to verify that you have an account on the particular system. If you do not have an account or you need additional permissions, you can request access by completing the eRA Access Request Form.
This form is also used if you are requesting additional security permissions for InfoEd (e.g. a Department Administrator requesting view access to proposals/protocols/accounts in his/her department or school) or another system. It is also for revoking access. You may type directly on the form and print it. The form must be signed by the applicant/requester and the applicant’s/requester’s supervisor and scanned or emailed to era-support@uconn.edu.
IRB approval must be obtained prior to initiating any research activity that meets either the DHHS definition of research involving human participants or the FDA definition of clinical investigation involving human participants and prior to implementing amendments to previously approved research (except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to participants). The IRB will publish submission deadlines for studies requiring review by the convened board at the start of each semester. New submissions requesting expedited review or exempt status can be submitted at any time and are reviewed on an on-going basis.
All forms required for an IRB submission are available on the IRB website. The PI is responsible for submitting complete forms and required supporting documentation. The PI must sign all submissions. Students are required to sign the submission when the research is student initiated (research is related to the doctoral dissertation or master’s degree). The signature of the Department Head or Dean is required for all submissions unless the research is funded by an external grant or contract. The signature of the medical monitor is required for interventional studies that are monitored by a physician. The IRB staff and reviewer reserve the right to return any submission that is incomplete or on out-dated forms.
Investigators make an initial determination for which type of review is appropriate for their study (full board, expedited, or exempt) and submit the required number of copies of the protocol and supporting documentation. Upon receipt, the IRB staff, in consultation with the Chair or an IRB member, screens the protocol to verify the PI’s initial determination. The protocol is then placed into the appropriate queue for review. The Chair, or his/her designee, makes the final determination of the type of review required and the appropriate expedited or exempt category.
A protocol application must be submitted to the IRB for any study for which research is the intent and the researcher proposes to use or involve any of the following:
The IRB reviews projects when the research:
Per 45 CFR 46.102, Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this policy, whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is considered research for other purposes. For example, some demonstration and service programs may include research activities.
In some cases, the UConn IRB must review pilot research and protocol development, including but not limited to the following activities:
*Please note that the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) considers the Principal Investigator as well as all research personnel to be human subjects if testing procedures are to be conducted on them. Therefore, even when pilot tests are conducted on study personnel, the protocol must be reviewed and approved by the IRB prior to initiation. Please refer to the policy on the Involvement of UConn Students and Employees in Research.
Pilot studies should be identified as such in applications to the IRB. The informed consent process must explain to subjects that the research is a pilot study.
Procedures that are not considered to be pilot research and do not need to be reviewed by the IRB include, but may not be limited to, the following:
The meeting schedule and submission deadlines are posted on the web. Adjustments to the meeting schedule may be made due to holidays or other issues. Adjustments will either be noted in the published meeting schedule (when known in advance) or announced via e-mail. The submission deadline for full board reviews is 10 working days prior to the meeting date.
Material requiring full-board review must be submitted by the published submission deadlines to provide sufficient time for screening and review prior to the meeting date. The IRB staff will send the agenda and material to IRB members via hand delivery or express mail within 2 – 3 working days after the submission deadline to allow members to have at least 7 working days for review of the material prior to the meeting date.
Under unusual circumstances, the Chair may call an emergency meeting of the board. However, such a meeting will not be called due to the negligence of the investigator to submit material on time. An emergency meeting may be called, for example, when a quorum for the originally scheduled meeting was not met and review is required to prevent lapse of a study, or if an investigator is faced with a situation beyond his/her control. If not already distributed, material must be distributed to members as soon as possible to allow for sufficient review. The investigator may be asked to attend the meeting to address questions, or provide additional information or clarification.
Under unusual circumstances, the IRB staff, in consultation with the Chair, may also add an item to the agenda after the submission deadline. Such circumstances generally involve situations in which an investigator is faced with a situation beyond his/her control and an amendment must be made to the protocol. The material must be distributed (via hand delivery, e-mail or express mail) to members as soon as possible to allow for sufficient review.
Pre-Award Services is housed within Sponsored Program Services (SPS) and reports to the Vice President for Research. Pre-Award Services consists of a team of expert research administrators who serve as dedicated central resources in all matters related to University and sponsor policies for proposal development and submission. Pre-Award Services is responsible for the review, approval and, in many cases, submission of research proposals on behalf of the University. All proposals are reviewed for compliance with sponsor guidelines as well as federal, state, local and University regulations and policies prior to approval and submission to the sponsor.
For more information, please visit the Pre-Award Contact page.
Websites
The University of Connecticut has implemented mandatory export control training for UConn researchers involved in any research that is export controlled.
As a result, any UConn investigator listed as project personnel for a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement where export control regulations apply must complete export control training certification prior to starting any work on that project. Such certification is valid for one (1) year from the date the training is completed. Certification must be completed annually if the investigator is still personnel on a project where export control regulations apply.
The training is available online and offered through the CITI Program. The Export Control Course offers eleven modules. They are:
Introduction to Export Compliance (ID: 16800)
Export Compliance for Researchers: Part I (ID: 16801)
Export Compliance for Researchers: Part II (ID: 16802)
Export Compliance for Research Administrators (ID: 16803)
Export Compliance and Biosafety (ID: 16805)
Export Compliance for Operational Departments (ID: 16806)
Export Compliance for International Shipping (ID: 16807)
Export Compliance and Purchasing (ID: 16808)
Export Compliance and International and Foreign Waters (ID: 16809)
Export Compliance and Collaborations (ID: 16810)
Export Compliance and United States Sanctions Programs (ID: 16812)
You will need to complete three modules to meet the training requirement.
Under Required, complete Introduction to Export Compliance (ID: 16800).
And under Supplemental, complete:
Export Compliance for Researchers: Part I (ID: 16801).
Export Compliance for Researchers: Part II (ID: 16802)
You may be required to complete other modules based on the nature of the regulations that apply to your research project. Research Integrity and Compliance Services will let you know if additional modules are required.
Once the required training certification has been completed, you will have met your export control training requirements for the year. Please make a note of the date of the certification as you will be required to complete the training again prior to the annual expiration date.
Export Control Compliance Requirements for Project Personnel
Project account will not be set up and no funding will be released until the compliance requirements are complete. Adding new personnel: New personnel cannot begin work on an active export controlled project unless the personnel has been approved by OVPR and the sponsor. Contact exportcontrol@uconn.edu if you wish to add someone new to an active export controlled project. |
UConn’s Export Control Policy can be found here.
These guidelines and sample documents are designed to determine if the EAR or the ITAR affect a particular research project, and to take appropriate action to ensure compliance with the Federal Export Control regulations.
In order to ensure that items are appropriately identified as EAR or ITAR controlled, the following processes will be implemented for all hardcopy or electronic documents that contain EAR or ITAR controlled Technical Data:
The following statement shall be included on the cover page, sleeve, or cover of any design file, software disc, or document (hardcopy or electronic) containing EAR or ITAR controlled Technical Data:
This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et q.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et seq. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.
Include the appropriate following statement in the footer on each page of design files or documents (hardcopy or electronic) which contains EAR or ITAR controlled Technical Data:
This page contains EAR Restricted Data.
This page contains ITAR Restricted Data.
Export control laws are federal regulations that govern how certain information, technologies, and commodities can be transmitted overseas or to a foreign national on U.S. soil. The scope of the regulations is broad: they cover exports in virtually all fields of science, engineering, and technology and apply to research activities regardless of the source of funding. Failure to comply with these laws can have serious consequences, both for the institution and for the individual researcher. Potential penalties include fines and possibly imprisonment. It is thus critical for UConn researchers to understand their obligations under these regulations and to work with Research Integrity and Compliance Services to ensure that the University is in compliance.
The International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) regulate defense articles, services, and related technical data that are identified on the Munitions Control List. They are administered by the Department of State. The Export Administration Regulations regulate the export of dual use items, i.e. items with both military and commercial applications, identified on the Commerce Control List. They are administered by the Department of Commerce. The Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulations (OFAC Regulations) regulate economic trade with foreign countries and administer the statutory economic trade sanctions imposed against several foreign countries. They are administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, through the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Material on this website is intended to assist faculty and staff in understanding the regulations. Furthermore it outlines UConn guidelines and procedures that are designed to ensure compliance.
If you have any questions about Export Control, please email exportcontrol@uconn.edu.
Internal Resources |
HuskySMS – Submit Registrations and Amendments via: uconn.scishield.com |
Last Revised 05/30/2025